It is only if you have noticed it or not.
The evidence as of now is excessively obvious.
This is the Hunter Biden’s Wikipedia page as of today:
Robert Hunter Biden (born February 4, 1970) is an American lawyer and investment advisor who is the second son of former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden. He is a founding partner of Rosemont Seneca Partners, an investment and advisory firm.
Biden served on the board of Burisma Holdings, a major Ukrainian natural gas producer, from 2014 to 2019. He and his father have been the subjects of debunked right-wing conspiracy theories pushed by Donald Trump and his allies concerning Biden business dealings and anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine.
The bias is nothing my readers wouldn’t expect but is worth note. A new, emerging investigation into corruption? Debunked right-wing conspiracy.
And what are the sources they use for this?
- Article by Factcheck.org – notoriously leftist
- Article by USA Today – notoriously leftist
- Articles by NBC News – notoriously leftist
- Article by The New Yorker – notoriously leftist
- Article by Vox – just lol
All from untrustworthy, lying mainstream media journalists. No actual evidence against the bombshell Hunter Biden laptop finds. Just random journos trying to save face.
Whereas any mention of “Russian collusion” against Trump, without any evidence whatsoever, was regarded as fact. And in most places on Wikipedia, still is.
Let’s take a look at the earliest variant of the Steele dossier:
The Trump–Russia dossier, also known as the Steele dossier, is a private intelligence report comprising memos written between June and December 2016 by Christopher Steele, a former head of the Russia Desk for British intelligence (MI6). The resulting dossier contains allegations of misconduct and conspiracy between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and the Government of Russia during the 2016 election, with campaign members and Russian operatives allegedly colluding to interfere in the election to benefit Trump. It also alleged that Russia sought to damage Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, including sharing negative information about Clinton with the Trump campaign.
The difference between the Steele dossier and Hunter’s laptop report? One has actually had some semblance of verification. And hint: It’s not the Steele dossier.
Yet, Wikipedia is way harsher on one candidate than the other. Because Wiki is run by leftists who continue to attempt to centralize their control on information distribution.
Even if you go look at Wikipedia for today, they don’t refer to the Steele dossier as a debunked left-wing conspiracy theory. Which it is.
You see, those labels are only reserved for right-leaning candidates.
Wikipedia is compromised. It always has been. It’s just more obvious now.