![Should women be allowed to vote? header](https://www.hiddendominion.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/should-women-be-allowed-to-vote.jpeg)
On Women Voting And An Ideal Voting System
I had two voting-related questions come up from my “Send Me Your Questions, Topics Of Interest, And Memes” article. These two questions were:
- What are your thoughts on women voting?
- What would voting look like in your ideal system, if at all?
These are both great questions, and two that need to be answered together in one article given their intermixed nature.
First:
What are your thoughts on women voting? Should women be allowed to vote?
My answer is no.
“Why Not?” is explained in answering #2.
Second:
What would voting look like in your ideal system, if at all?
If we’re going to have voting at all in our future political system, the voting system itself needs to change to have these two new components:
- The voting system must be oversight voting, not direct voting or representational voting. I.e., we should not vote directly for leaders or laws, but rather vote to enforce some level of oversight over what the leadership does.
- Direct democracy has demonstrated itself to be a massive failure and the republic system has fared little better. I do not understand how people living through the horrific republic we have right now still want to keep a republic. This system sucks. Our original (actual) republican system even failed within a hundred years (1776—1865). And don’t get me started on direct democracy. That would just be even worse.
- We need strong leadership, not a bunch of losers elected by the average person. If we’re going to have voting at all, it needs to be for oversight over the actions of the leadership to restrict their excesses only. This is how we achieve “rollback” sustainability of a political system. Oversight voting can only restrict progressivism advances, not to push forward new things or new radicals, which inevitably degenerate/corrupt the system. I write about this more in these two articles: Oversight Voting Instead Of Representative Or Direct Voting & Oversight Voting: Preventing Psychopaths From Getting Power, but I do admittedly need to dive into this topic further to explain all my thoughts surrounding it.
- Voting must be done solely by families. Absolutely no individual should be allowed to vote for anything—Male or female. Families only.
- To get a vote, one must be married with kids (in a traditional Biblical marriage—not sodomy/polygamy/other modern abominations). (Sidenote: I always get the retort “What if we can’t have kids?” My response is harsh but straightforward: I don’t care. Go adopt, then. Someone voting must have a stake in the future of the country past their own death. Childless people do not. So you’re out.)
- Divorced? Lost the vote. Single parent? No vote. It is what it is.
- Families should only get one vote. A family should be in consensus or it shouldn’t be voting, anyway. Since the Bible says that the man is the head of the household, he should fulfill the family vote requirement. This renders women voting moot.
This is how a voting system should be setup, if we end up keeping the vote around.
This process is similar, but more formal and voting-based, to how the average people “overseen” the monarchy in many nations during Christendom. Those Middle Ages people used to keep the leadership in check by curbing their excesses if they ever went too far. They “overseen” through rioting, financial rebellion, or other pushback methods against the king. This kind of voting system is a simple way to get that same outcome without the old Middle Ages bloodshed/rebellion.
With this, we could return to the last time our civilization was working well (Christendom). But we’d still be able to incorporate a hedge against totalitarianism. We can also develop further from this point later to refine everything else out.
Therefore, to answer the second question: We don’t have to have voting, but I’d prefer it if we structured it like this. Oversight voting by family is the way to go. That’s my ideal setup.
I do not come to these conclusions lightly. I’ve been studying sustainable political systems for over a decade now. The harsh reality is that I see no way to create a sustainable voting system where non-families vote. It just is not possible. We need mature people with a stake in the future of the country to be the only voters. Everyone else can enjoy the fruits of the land, but should not oversee it. Even with this restriction, voting still needs to be oversight based and not direct or representational to be viable.
There are my thoughts on voting systems. My sympathies in advance to all those who will be offended: Single men, women, sodomites, the divorced, and everyone else alike. This position may seem “extreme”, but it was also common-sense and completely reasonable for all of human history minus the last hundred or so years. So maybe I’m not the odd one out: Modernity is.
Family oversight voting or bust. That’s my position.
Read Next: Regional Independence Movements Within The U.S.
If you enjoyed this article, bookmark the website and check back often for new content. New articles most weekdays.
You can also keep up with my writing by joining my monthly newsletter.
Help fight the censorship – Share this article!